Page Contents


A hasOne relation denotes a one-to-one connection of a model to another model through referential integrity. The referential integrity is enforced by a foreign key constraint on the target model which usually references a primary key on the source model and a unique constraint on the same column/key to ensure one-to-one mapping. This relation indicates that each instance of the declaring or source model has exactly one instance of the target model. Let’s take an example where an application has models Supplier and Account and a Supplier can only have one Account on the system as illustrated in the diagram below.

hasOne relation illustration

The diagram shows target model Account has property supplierId as the foreign key to reference the declaring model Supplier’s primary key id. supplierId needs to also be used in a unique index to ensure each Supplier has only one related Account instance.

To add a hasOne relation to your LoopBack application and expose its related routes, you need to perform the following steps:

  1. Decorate properties on the source and target models with @hasOne and @belongsTo to let LoopBack gather the neccessary metadata.
  2. Modify the source model repository class to provide access to a constrained target model repository.
  3. Call the constrained target model repository CRUD APIs in your controller methods.

Right now, LoopBack collects the neccessary metadata and exposes the relation APIs for the hasOne relation, but does not guarantee referential integrity. This has to be set up by the user or DBA in the underlying database and an example is shown below on how to do it with MySQL.

Defining a hasOne Relation

This section describes how to define a hasOne relation at the model level using the @hasOne decorator. The relation constrains the target repository by the foreign key property on its associated model. The hasOne relation is defined on a source model Supplier in the example below:


import {Account} from './account.model.ts';
import {Entity, property, hasOne} from '@loopback/repository';

export class Supplier extends Entity {
    type: 'number',
    id: true,
  id: number;

    type: 'string',
    required: true,
  name: string;

  @hasOne(() => Account)
  account?: Account;

  constructor(data: Partial<Supplier>) {

On the other side of the relation, we’d need to declare a belongsTo relation since every Account has to belong to exactly one Supplier:

import {Supplier} from './supplier.model.ts';
import {Entity, property, belongsTo} from '@loopback/repository';

export class Account extends Entity {
    type: 'number',
    id: true,
  id: number;

    type: 'string',
  accountManager: string;

  @belongsTo(() => Supplier)
  supplierId: number;

  constructor(data: Partial<Account>) {

The definition of the hasOne relation is inferred by using the @hasOne decorator. The decorator takes in a function resolving the target model class constructor and optionally a has one relation definition object which can e.g. contain a custom foreign key to be stored as the relation metadata. The decorator logic also designates the relation type and tries to infer the foreign key on the target model (keyTo in the relation metadata) to a default value (source model name appended with id in camel case, same as LoopBack 3).

The decorated property name is used as the relation name and stored as part of the source model definition’s relation metadata.

A usage of the decorator with a custom foreign key name for the above example is as follows:

// import statements
class Supplier extends Entity {
  // constructor, properties, etc.
  @hasOne(() => Account, {keyTo: 'suppId'})
  account?: Account;

Setting up your database for hasOne relation - MySQL

At the moment, LoopBack does not provide the means to enforce referential integrity for the hasOne relation. It is up to users to set this up at the database layer so constraints are not violated. Let’s take MySQL as the backing database for our application. Given the Supplier has one Account scenario above, we need to run two SQL statements on the Account table for the database to enforce referential integrity and align with LoopBack’s hasOne relation.

  1. Make supplierId property or column a foreign key which references the id from Supplier model’s id property:
ALTER TABLE <databaseName>.Account ADD FOREIGN KEY (supplierId) REFERENCES <databaseName>.Supplier(id);
  1. Create a unique index for the same property supplierId, so that for each Supplier instance, there is only one associated Account instance.
   ALTER TABLE <databaseName>.Account ADD UNIQUE INDEX supplierIndex (supplierId);

Before making the following changes, please follow the steps outlined in Database Migrations to create the database schemas defined by the models in your application.

Configuring a hasOne relation

The configuration and resolution of a hasOne relation takes place at the repository level. Once hasOne relation is defined on the source model, then there are a couple of steps involved to configure it and use it. On the source repository, the following are required:

  • In the constructor of your source repository class, use Dependency Injection to receive a getter function for obtaining an instance of the target repository. _Note: We need a getter function, accepting a string repository name instead of a repository constructor, or a repository instance, in Account to break a cyclic dependency between a repository with a hasOne relation and a repository with the matching belongsTo relation.

  • Declare a property with the factory function type HasOneRepositoryFactory<targetModel, typeof> on the source repository class.

  • Call the createHasOneRepositoryFactoryFor function in the constructor of the source repository class with the relation name (decorated relation property on the source model) and target repository instance and assign it the property mentioned above.

The following code snippet shows how it would look like:


import {Account, Supplier} from '../models';
import {AccountRepository} from './account.repository';
import {
} from '@loopback/repository';
import {inject, Getter} from '@loopback/core';

export class SupplierRepository extends DefaultCrudRepository<
> {
  public readonly account: HasOneRepositoryFactory<
    @inject('datasources.db') protected db: juggler.DataSource,
    getAccountRepository: Getter<AccountRepository>,
  ) {
    super(Customer, db);
    this.account = this.createHasOneRepositoryFactoryFor(

The following CRUD APIs are now available in the constrained target repository factory Account for instances of supplierRepository:

  • create for creating an Account model instance belonging to Supplier model instance (API Docs)
  • get finding the target model instance belonging to Supplier model instance (API Docs)

Using hasOne constrained repository in a controller

The same pattern used for ordinary repositories to expose their CRUD APIs via controller methods is employed for hasOne repositories. Once the hasOne relation has been defined and configured, controller methods can call the underlying constrained repository CRUD APIs and expose them as routes once decorated with Route decorators. It will require the value of the foreign key and, depending on the request method, a value for the target model instance as demonstrated below.


import {post, param, requestBody} from '@loopback/rest';
import {CustomerRepository} from '../repositories/';
import {Customer, Account} from '../models/';
import {repository} from '@loopback/repository';

export class SupplierAccountController {
    protected supplierRepository: SupplierRepository,
  ) {}

  async createAccount(
    @param.path.number('id') supplierId: typeof,
    @requestBody() accountData: Account,
  ): Promise<Account> {
    return await this.supplierRepository

In LoopBack 3, the REST APIs for relations were exposed using static methods with the name following the pattern __{methodName}__{relationName}__ (e.g. Supplier.__find__account). We recommend to create a new controller for each relation in LoopBack 4. First, it keeps controller classes smaller. Second, it creates a logical separation of ordinary repositories and relational repositories and thus the controllers which use them. Therefore, as shown above, don’t add Account-related methods to SupplierController, but instead create a new SupplierAccountController class for them.